Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/9/1998

State v. Garcia

Citations

582 N.W.2d 879
1998 Minn. LEXIS 410
1998 WL 378348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that if a court corrects a 8 sentence that was part of a plea agreement, the defendant “must be allowed to withdraw from the plea agreement if he so chooses”
holding that where the specific sentence promised by the prosecution did not include the mandatory conditional-release term, the promise was unauthorized by law and the defendant must be allowed to withdraw the plea
stating that, when applying a prior version of the statute, the terms of conditional-release statute are “mandatory and nonwaivable”
declining to grant defendant specific performance of plea agreement when it included terms that district court had no authority to impose in first place
“As [the statute] requires that Garcia’s sentence include a conditional release term, his original sentence without the term was unauthorized and the court had jurisdiction under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9 to amend it.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.