State v. Christopherson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the fact that the conditional release was not mentioned to [defendant] at the time the original plea was entered is not, in itself, enough to demonstrate that his plea was not accurate, voluntary, and intelligent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martinek v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-05-04· cited 8×
• Oldenburg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-04-07· cited 8×
• James v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-02-03· cited 6×
• Munger v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-08-28· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-25· cited 74×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-02-24· cited 73×
• Alanis v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-06· cited 70×
• State v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-09· cited 43×
• State v. Jumping Eagle
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-12-28· cited 41×
• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-24· cited 22×
• Vernlund v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-19· cited 8×