West Virginia Supreme Court· 12/12/2001
State v. Gamble
Citations
- 563 S.E.2d 790
- 211 W. Va. 125
- 2001 W. Va. LEXIS 191
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have been asked to interpret the state’s obligations under the IAD on several occasions[.j”
- “[T]he IAD, once triggered, places an obligation on authorities in this state to deal promptly with a prisoner incarcerated in another state, provided that the prisoner has met the requirements of the statute[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGRAW
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-06-21· cited 871×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-12-08· cited 442×
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 278×
- State Ex Rel. Stines v. LockeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Maynard v. BronsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-05-12· cited 23×
- State Ex Rel. Sutton v. KeadleWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 15×
- State Ex Rel. Boso v. WarmuthWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-07-08· cited 14×
- State v. SomerlotWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-01-05· cited 13×
- People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-10-02· cited 13×
- State Ex Rel. Modie v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-03-28· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.