Skip to main content
· 5/12/1981

State Ex Rel. Maynard v. Bronson

Citations

  • 277 S.E.2d 718
  • 167 W. Va. 35
  • 1981 W. Va. LEXIS 616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[P]rohibition cannot be substituted for a writ of error or appeal unless a writ of error or appeal would be an inadequate remedy.\ (citations omitted)
  • “[Prohibition cannot be substituted for a writ of error or appeal unless a writ of error or appeal would be an inadequate remedy.” (citations omitted)
  • \[P]rohibition cannot be substituted for a writ of error or appeal unless a writ of error or appeal would be an inadequate remedy.\ (citations omitted)
  • “[P]rohibition cannot be substituted for a writ of error or appeal unless a writ of error or appeal would be an inadequate remedy.”
  • “The right to prohibition must clearly appear, for example, before the petitioner is entitled to such remedy.”
  • “[t]he right to prohibition must clearly appear”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.