New Mexico Court of Appeals· 6/6/2003
State v. Gallegos
Citations
- 70 P.3d 1277
- 133 N.M. 838
- 2003 NMCA 079
- 2003 WL 21361861
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that evidence seized by border patrol agents in violation of New Mexico’s state constitution “can and will be excluded from use in state proceedings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castillo, Bustamante, Sutin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 466×
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 264×
- State v. Cardenas-AlvarezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-30· cited 114×
- State v. CorneauNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-05-16· cited 76×
- State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-19· cited 68×
- State v. FranksNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-07-18· cited 62×
- State v. WagonerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-02-14· cited 51×
- State v. WagonerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-20· cited 37×
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-09-16· cited 31×
- State v. DiazNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-09-10· cited 24×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-08-11· cited 21×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-12-27· cited 18×
- State v. Van ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-04-13· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.