Skip to main content

State v. Gaiovnik

Citations

  • 794 N.W.2d 643
  • 2011 Minn. LEXIS 66
  • 2011 WL 798705

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that merely “grabbing” or “yanking” the victim’s arm satisfied the simple robbery’s force element
  • holding that “the district court did not err in ordering [the defendant] to pay restitution ... as pari of Ms sentence” (emphasis added)
  • holding that noncompliance with section 611A.045 at the district court does not preclude appellate 7 challenges to the district court’s authority to award restitution
  • explaining that Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(b), applies to disputes about the amount or type of restitution
  • stating that we read words of a statute “in the light of their context”
  • “When interpreting statutes, we do not examine different provisions in isolation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gildea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.