Skip to main content
· 7/29/2015

In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLP

Citations

  • 867 N.W.2d 502
  • 2015 Minn. LEXIS 385
  • 2015 WL 4597534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We will affirm agency conclusions even if we may have reached a different conclusion if we were the factfinder.”
  • “We will affirm agency conclusions even if we may have reached a different conclusion if we were the factfinder.”
  • “[W]hen the words of a statute are clear, we may not disregard the letter of the law under the pretext of pursuing the law’s spirit.” (quoting Gassler v. State, 787 N.W.2d 575, 585 (Minn. 2010))
  • “[W]e construe words and phrases according to their plain and ordinary meaning, and we give effect to all of [the statute’s] provisions; no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant.” (second’ alteration in original) (citations omitted)
  • declining to reach an issue that was “inadequately briefed”
  • declining to reach an issue that was “inadequately briefed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.