Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/29/2000
State v. Fulkrod
Citations
- 735 N.E.2d 851
- 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1571
- 2000 WL 1449250
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Any continuing jurisdiction after final judgment has been pronounced must either derive from the judgment itself or be granted to the court by statute or rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb, Mathias, Mattingly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fulkrod v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-11-02· cited 24×
- State of Indiana v. Tammy Sue HarperIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-05-14· cited 21×
- State v. FulkrodIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 19×
- Keys v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-17· cited 11×
- State of Indiana v. John J. ArnoldIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-27· cited 8×
- Derek Hale v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-08-06· cited 3×
- Aaron Blanche v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-12-14
- State v. BrunnerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-08-06
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sims v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-01-23· cited 70×
- Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-08-16· cited 67×
- Schweitzer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-10-14· cited 20×
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-12-20· cited 19×
- Dier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 13×
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-10· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.