Skip to main content
· 2/27/2015

State of Indiana v. John J. Arnold

Citations

  • 27 N.E.3d 315
  • 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 121
  • 2015 WL 873274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n the interests of judicial economy we will treat [the] motion to set aside habitual offender enhancement as a request for postconviction relief and review the trial court’s judgment accordingly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Friedlander, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.