Skip to main content

Marshall v. State

Citations

  • 563 N.E.2d 1341
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1662
  • 1990 WL 210246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • balancing defendant’s rehabilitative conduct against the aggravating circumstances in original sentencing order in affirming denial of motion to modify sentence
  • post- incarceration conduct should be balanced against sentencing considerations in considering a motion for sentence modification
  • “[T]he mere fact that the process of rehabilitation, the purpose of incarceration, may have started, does not compel a reduction or other modification in . . . sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shields, Robertson, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.