Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/15/1976

State v. Fuentes

Citations

549 P.2d 224
26 Ariz. App. 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding full statutory sentencing range available after revocation of probation absent indication stipulated sentencing range in plea agreement applied to post-revocation sentence
finding full statutory sentencing range available after revocation of probation absent indication stipulated sentencing range in plea agreement applied to post-revocation sentence
finding appeal untimely when more than twenty days elapsed since defendant’s sentencing date
“[B]oth the imposition of probation and the subsequent imprisonment after revocation constitute punishment flowing from the same offense.”
“Double jeopardy principles do not proscribe successive or multiple facets of an otherwise constitutionally acceptable punishment scheme adopted by a state as punishment to be imposed as the result of any one particular conviction.”
probation treated as a sentence for the purpose of calculating the time to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eubank, Haire, Jacobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.