Washington Supreme Court· 1/21/2010

State v. Fry

Citations

168 Wash. 2d 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that under the previous medical marijuana statutes, the existence of an applicable affirmative defense did not negate probable cause
explaining that “[a]n affirmative defense admits the defendant committed a criminal act but pleads an excuse for doing so”; it “does not negate any elements of the charged crime”
explaining that “[a]n affirmative defense admits the defendant committed a criminal act but pleads an excuse for doing so”
explaining that \[a]n affirmative defense admits the defendant committed a criminal act but pleads an excuse for doing so\; it \does not negate any elements of the charged crime\
suggesting the smell of marijuana wafting over a threshold provides probable cause to support a search warrant
suggesting the smell of marijuana wafting over a threshold provides probable cause to support a search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders, Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.