State v. Kurtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an affirmative defense is necessary only when one’s conduct falls outside the specific conduct protected under RCW 69.51A.040
• explaining that an affirmative defense is necessary only when one's conduct falls outside the specific conduct protected under RCW 69.51A.040
• explaining that an affirmative defense is necessary only when one's conduct falls outside the specific conduct protected under RCW 69.51A.040
• holding the common law defense of medical necessity is still available even after the Medical Use of Cannabis Act
• availability of medical necessity defense
• availability of medical necessity defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2015-05-07· cited 28×
• Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-03-31· cited 24×
• State v. Reis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-03-31· cited 14×
• Hvolboll v. Wolff Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-12· cited 10×
• State v. Markwart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-03· cited 8×
• State of Washington v. Gabriel Ruelas, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-03-12· cited 6×
• State Of Washington v. William Michael Reis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-03-31
• State of Washington v. Tyler J. Markwart
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-03
• Courtney A. Little & James S. Little v. Rosauers Supermarkets, Inc. dba/aka Super 1 Foods
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-12-13

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
• United States v. Bailey
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 1,333×
• City of Milwaukee v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1981-04-28· cited 543×
• Mobil Oil Corp. v. Higginbotham
  Supreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 509×
• Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 237×
• People v. Lovercamp
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-12-11· cited 172×
• Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-28· cited 159×
• Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 122×
• Seeley v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 105×
• State v. Fry
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 82×
• State v. Diana
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-12-20· cited 67×
• Potter v. Washington State Patrol
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-11-26· cited 60×
• Spokane County Health District v. Brockett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 55×
• United States v. Mowat
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-07-18· cited 47×
• Nelson v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-07-20· cited 32×
• State v. Gallegos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-04-11· cited 26×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-04· cited 25×
• United States v. Ashton
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1834-10-15· cited 24×
• State v. Butler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-05· cited 21×
• State v. Cole
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-06-15· cited 13×