Skip to main content

State v. Patterson

Citations

  • 434 P.2d 808
  • 200 Kan. 176
  • 1967 Kan. LEXIS 481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not error where it allowed testimony of “marital discord” to show motive and intent
  • allowing testimony that defendant had threatened his wife’s life as evidence of marital discord as it had a bearing on defendant’s motive and intent and noting that evidence was especially necessary since it was case of marital homicide
  • allowing testimony that defendant had threatened his wife's life as evidence of marital discord as it had a bearing on defendant's motive and intent and noting that evidence was especially necessary since it was case of marital homicide
  • “The evidence of the discordant marital relationship between the defendant and [the victim], his previous assaults on her, including his threats to kill her, was competent as bearing on the defendant’s motive and intent, particularly since this is a case of marital homicide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.