State v. Bethune

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[DJismissal is a drastic remedy to be reserved for severe situations. Dismissal frustrates the public’s interest in the orderly administration of criminal justice.”
• “[Dismissal is a drastic remedy to be reserved for severe situations. Dismissal frustrates the public’s interest in the orderly administration of criminal justice.”
• ORS 135.755 does not authorize dismissal because of the defendant’s frustration and inconvenience, when there is no evidence that defendant’s rights have been prejudiced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Freeman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-05-04· cited 10×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-09-27· cited 9×
• State v. Stough
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-11· cited 5×
• State v. Hilligoss
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-06-07· cited 5×
• State v. Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 3×
• State v. Hargreaves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Caruso
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-24· cited 25×
• State v. Shepherd
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-04-07· cited 13×
• State v. Sharp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-02-08· cited 11×
• State v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-11· cited 4×