Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/19/1989

State v. Fratzke

Citations

446 N.W.2d 781
1989 WL 123160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing the harassment conviction because, although the language fell under the statute, it could be construed to have a “legitimate purpose”
defining fighting words as “those personally abusive epithets which ‘by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace’ ” (citation omitted)
reversing harassment conviction based on citizen’s letter complaining about speed laws, enforcement priorities, and one particular state trooper
identifying protest of government action as a legitimate purpose for offensive written communication
“‘Fighting words’ are those personally abusive epithets which ‘by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace’” (quoting Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 572 (1942))
insufficient evidence of lack of legitimate purpose for letter led to reversal of harassment conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Schultz, Neuman, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.