Skip to main content

State v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 298 N.W.2d 267
  • 1980 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “[ijmpossible uncertainty over the so-called general mores” renders a moral “right and wrong” test “an unfit tool for determining the mental competency of a person to consent to a sex act”
  • reasoning that \[i]mpossible uncertainty over the so-called general mores\ renders a moral \right and wrong\ test \an unfit tool for determining the mental competency of a person to consent to a sex act\
  • rejecting, on vagueness grounds, precisely this interpretation of the Iowa statute
  • rejecting, on vagueness grounds, precisely this interpretation of the Iowa statute
  • “The person mounting the constitutional challenge on a legislative enactment carries the heavy burden to rebut a strong presumption of constitutionality.”
  • looking to similar statutes to give definiteness to a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: LeGRAND, McCORMICK, McGIVERIN, Reynoldson, Schultz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.