Skip to main content
· 11/1/2002

Cella v. State

Citations

  • 831 So. 2d 716
  • 2002 WL 31431560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rule 3.170(i) was proper vehicle to challenge plea where defendant filed motion claiming defendant did not understand consequences of plea within thirty days of sentence
  • stating that a defendant who has adjudication withheld and who successfully completes the term of probation imposed is not a convicted person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.