State v. Prichard
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 56
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., Trial court erred in admitting document produced in discovery by defendant and offered by State because it was not properly authenticated. Implied authentication not appropriate under circumstances of this criminal case where rules of evidence apply. Even excising improper evidence, error was harmless because remaining evidence established defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Defendant's ineffective assistance claim relating to same evidence fails second element of Strickland.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-18· cited 492×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 384×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-29· cited 69×
- State v. SpikesOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-29· cited 36×
- State v. KinneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-06· cited 4×
- State v. FowlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.