Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/20/1978
State v. Foster
Citations
- 589 P.2d 1319
- 121 Ariz. 287
- 1978 Ariz. App. LEXIS 720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- state has burden of proving specific intent to defraud business establishment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richmond, Howard, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-04-16· cited 21×
- State v. BecerillCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-12-05· cited 10×
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-05-05· cited 5×
- State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-05-15· cited 5×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-12-19· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Allen BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-03-19
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BengeArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-04· cited 56×
- Salazar v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-12-17· cited 53×
- Klockenbrink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-07-31· cited 50×
- State v. LacqueyArizona Supreme Court· 1977-11-15· cited 31×
- State v. JamisonArizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-16· cited 20×
- State v. GuthrieArizona Supreme Court· 1972-04-21· cited 17×
- State v. AhumadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-12-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.