Skip to main content

State v. Foster

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 836

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Judgment affirmed. The trial court engaged in the proper analysis, considered the required statutory criteria, and made the necessary findings before imposing consecutive sentences. Moreover, the record clearly supports the trial court's findings that consecutive sentences were appropriate in this case.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.