Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/18/1997
State v. Ford
Citations
- 936 P.2d 255
- 262 Kan. 206
- 1997 Kan. LEXIS 67
- 1997 WL 186953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that a statute operates prospectively unless its language clearly indicates that the legislature intended it to operate retroactively.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-05-27· cited 78×
- State v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-06-06· cited 50×
- State v. ReasonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 47×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-06-28· cited 40×
- In Re Tax Appeal of Alsop Sand Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1998-07-10· cited 24×
- In Re Application of American Restaurant OperationsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-04-17· cited 21×
- State v. OvertonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 17×
- State v. RoseboroughSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 12×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-01-05· cited 11×
- State v. StandiferCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-10-10· cited 7×
- Comer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-07-18· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.