Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/3/2005

State v. Overton

Citations

279 Kan. 547
112 P.3d 244
2005 Kan. LEXIS 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting defendant should have included affidavits from jurors in motion for new trial based on juror misconduct
\[T]he fundamental rule for sentencing is that the person convicted of a crime is sentenced in accordance with the sentencing provisions in effect at the time the crime was committed.\
\All evidence supporting the State's charges is prejudicial to the defendant.\
\All evidence supporting the State's charges is prejudicial to the defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.