Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 6/29/1989

State v. Florez

Citations

  • 777 P.2d 452
  • 111 Utah Adv. Rep. 28
  • 1989 Utah LEXIS 67
  • 1989 WL 73126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State is not required to accept a defendant's stipulation to facts in lieu of presenting potentially damaging evidence that is otherwise admissible
  • in first-degree murder trial with prior conviction as element of the offense, bifurcated trial required
  • in first-degree murder trial with prior conviction as element of the offense, bifurcated trial required
  • state has a right to introduce evi dence on every element
  • noting our inherent supervisory power
  • noting our inherent supervisory power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.