New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/3/2004
State v. Flores
Citations
- 2004 NMSC 21
- 135 N.M. 759
- 2004 NMSC 021
- 93 P.3d 1264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that unless jury unanimously rejects defendant’s claim of mental retardation, court shall impose life imprisonment
- holding that unless jury unanimously rejects defendant's claim of mental retardation, court shall impose life imprisonment
- “A body organized to administer justice, and including both judge and jury.”
- Ring not applicable to mental retardation determination
- Ring not applicable to mental retardation determination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chávez, Maes, Minzner, Serna, Bosson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-21· cited 300×
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
- Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 2004-11-16· cited 152×
- Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-04-22· cited 107×
- State v. FrawleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-10-25· cited 90×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 89×
- State v. TafoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-04-28· cited 83×
- Breen v. Carlsbad Municipal SchoolsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-08-15· cited 61×
- State v. GrellArizona Supreme Court· 2006-06-06· cited 59×
- State v. Rudy B.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-10-19· cited 57×
- State v. OrdunezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-07-19· cited 55×
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-08-10· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. BraceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 28×
- Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-11-17· cited 27×
- State v. LinaresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 12×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-02-16· cited 11×
- State v. JimenezSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-06-18· cited 6×
- Rodriguez v. Brand West DairyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2016-06-30· cited 6×
- Blancett v. Dial Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-01-16· cited 5×
- In re Pers. Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court· 2017-05-18
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-11· cited 331×
- State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-14· cited 149×
- Head v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-10-06· cited 133×
- Clark v. TansyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-09-07· cited 71×
- In Re: Kia Levoy Johnson, MovantFifth Circuit· 2003-06-10· cited 70×
- Huey v. LenteNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-09-28· cited 66×
- State Ex Rel. State Park & Recreation Commission v. New Mexico State AuthorityNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-02-28· cited 46×
- State v. CheadleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 40×
- State v. WadeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-12· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.