Skip to main content

Howell v. State

Citations

  • 151 S.W.3d 450
  • 2004 Tenn. LEXIS 958
  • 2004 WL 2601045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Code section 40-30-117(a) “provides only three grounds for reopening post-conviction proceedings.”
  • finding that a capital petitioner’s interest “in protecting his very life” outweighs the governmental interest in the finality of judgments
  • finding that a capital petitioner’s interest “in protecting his very life” outweighs the governmental interest in the finality of judgments
  • rejecting argument that scores used to establish first prong of test should be adjusted using a five-point standard error of measurement
  • rejecting argument that scores used to establish first prong of test should be adjusted using a five-point standard error of measurement
  • listing more states of accord, including Georgia, Mississippi, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, and Virginia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice William M. Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.