Skip to main content

State v. Acevedo

Citations

  • 11 A.3d 858
  • 205 N.J. 40
  • 2011 N.J. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentencing arguments are \not . . . appropriate ground[s] for [PCR].\
  • holding claims of excessive sentence are not available on PCR and may only be raised on direct appeal
  • noting that an illegal sentence is one \imposed without regard to some constitutional safeguard or procedural requirement\
  • holding the sentencing court's failure to state reasons for imposition of consecutive sentences did not render sentences illegal
  • explaining an \allegation[] of improper consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors\ does not support a cognizable illegal-sentence claim in a PCR petition
  • \a truly 'illegal' sentence can be corrected 'at any time.'\ (citing R. 3:21-10(b)(5), R. 3:22-12)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Acevedo

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.