Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/20/1978
State v. Mayes
Citations
- 579 P.2d 999
- 20 Wash. App. 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that wiretap interception in California, which was in compliance with California law, but not with Washington law, was admissible in Washington court
- holding that wiretap interception in California, which was in compliance with California law, but not with Washington law, was admissible in Washington court
- Washington statute prohibiting admissibility of information obtained from interceptions made “in violation of” the statute does not require exclusion of evidence obtained from interception made in California and valid under California law
- Washington statute prohibiting admissibility of information obtained from interceptions made \in violation of\ the statute does not require exclusion of evidence obtained from interception made in California and valid under California law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
- State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court· 1983-03-10· cited 291×
- People v. BarrowIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 241×
- Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 151×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1980-10-09· cited 101×
- Mustafa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-06-25· cited 87×
- Hiatt v. Walker Chevrolet Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 68×
- Perry v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-10· cited 59×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-07-09· cited 28×
- Major v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-03-10· cited 14×
- State v. KichinkoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-06-02· cited 12×
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-06-08· cited 9×
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-24· cited 5×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-08-13· cited 3×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 586×
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 308×
- State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court· 1950-05-13· cited 183×
- Roberts v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 172×
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 160×
- State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court· 1952-01-24· cited 128×
- State v. CernyWashington Supreme Court· 1971-01-28· cited 59×
- City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1971-09-09· cited 55×
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-07-09· cited 46×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-09-07· cited 29×
- People v. FormatoNew York Court of Appeals· 1956-02-09· cited 28×
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-01-25· cited 25×
- State v. NiblackWashington Supreme Court· 1968-07-18· cited 25×
- City of Seattle v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-10-19· cited 22×
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-03-21· cited 22×
- People v. CanardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-12-26· cited 20×
- People v. FormatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1955-07-08· cited 20×
- State v. ModicaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-12-28· cited 16×
- State v. SteppCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-08-26· cited 12×
- People v. CaravellaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-03-25· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.