· 2/13/2009
Harsch v. Miller
Citations
- 200 P.3d 467
- 288 Kan. 280
- 2009 Kan. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \the right to appeal is entirely statutory and that the limits of [appellate] jurisdiction are imposed by the legislature\
- noting that trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify a judgment after it has been appealed and the appeal is docketed at the appellate level
- noting that only voluntary compliance with the judgment constitutes acquiescence
- listing cases where district courts retained jurisdiction over portions of case even while other parts were on appeal
- listing cases where district courts retained jurisdiction over portions of case even while other parts were on appeal
- recognizing authority to manage case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nuss, McFarland, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.