Skip to main content
· 2/13/2009

Harsch v. Miller

Citations

  • 200 P.3d 467
  • 288 Kan. 280
  • 2009 Kan. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \the right to appeal is entirely statutory and that the limits of [appellate] jurisdiction are imposed by the legislature\
  • noting that trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify a judgment after it has been appealed and the appeal is docketed at the appellate level
  • noting that only voluntary compliance with the judgment constitutes acquiescence
  • listing cases where district courts retained jurisdiction over portions of case even while other parts were on appeal
  • listing cases where district courts retained jurisdiction over portions of case even while other parts were on appeal
  • recognizing authority to manage case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, McFarland, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.