State v. Zaha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the circumstances, the defendant’s companion requests for a continuance and removal of court-appointed counsel so that he could retain counsel “was not an attempt to destroy or impede ‘the orderly processes of justice’ ”
• unexplained delay in the transfer of the defendant’s funds that prevented him from hiring attorney at an earlier date was beyond defendant’s control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).