State v. Felix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to require interlocutory double jeopardy claim be brought by special action
• “The exercise of our jurisdiction to address an issue raised by special action is discretionary—we may decline jurisdiction and thereby render no decision on the merits at all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Paris-Sheldon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-15· cited 39×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-13· cited 6×
• State of Arizona v. Jill Irene Paris-Sheldon
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-03-15
• State v. Sanchez-Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-12-10

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• Duncan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
• Abney v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
• DiBella v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 657×
• State v. Moody
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
• Blake v. Schwartz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-02-21· cited 37×
• Nalbandian v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-06-27· cited 34×
• Wilson v. Ellis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-12-01· cited 33×
• State v. Millanes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-03-31· cited 33×
• Jackson v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-03-18· cited 17×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-16· cited 16×