Skip to main content

State v. Cross

Citations

  • 532 P.2d 1357
  • 216 Kan. 511
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In determining the relevancy of a prior conviction under K.S.A. 60-455 the matter is left largely to the judicial discretion of the trial judge.”
  • \In determining the relevancy of a prior conviction under K.S.A. 60-455 the matter is left largely to the judicial discretion of the trial judge.\
  • there must be “ a pattern, similarity or connection between the facts surrounding the prior offense and the one with which the accused is presently charged.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Fatzer, Fromme, Fontron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.