State v. Faubion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when evaluating reasonable suspicion, we examine the facts known to the officer at the time the stop occurred
• stating that “the existence of possible lawful explanations for circumstances or behavior does not negate the develop- ment of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rudnitskyy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-29· cited 10×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-06-13· cited 4×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-25· cited 1×
• State v. Hollins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hall
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
• State v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
• State v. Rodgers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
• State v. Amaya
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-04-29· cited 110×
• State v. Mitchele
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 33×
• State v. Frias
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-10· cited 17×
• State v. Dampier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-07-27· cited 10×
• State v. Magana
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-19· cited 3×