State v. Erickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing this court’s power not only to promulgate court rules, citing Minn.Stat. § 480.059, but also to “suspend the exercise of those rules where appropriate to ensure the proper administration of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Shattuck
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-10-06· cited 124×
• State v. Dahlin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-24· cited 43×
• State v. Heaney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-12-02· cited 25×
• In Re Estate of Janecek
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-05-18· cited 21×
• State v. Gianakos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-23· cited 21×
• State v. Azure
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-25· cited 14×
• State v. Cheng
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-03-22· cited 9×
• People v. Superior Court of Orange County
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-07-25· cited 8×
• OCC, LLC v. Cnty. of Hennepin (In re OCC, LLC)
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-08-29· cited 1×
• J.O. v. Super. Ct.
  California Supreme Court· 2026-05-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Holmes
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-02-02· cited 168×
• State v. Salitros
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-05-14· cited 119×
• In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-04-16· cited 68×
• State v. Gardner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1902-12-19· cited 59×
• In Re Senty-Haugen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-20· cited 47×
• State v. City Court of City of Tucson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 26×