Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2/2/1982

State v. Holmes

Citations

315 N.W.2d 703
106 Wis. 2d 31
1982 Wisc. LEXIS 2504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it is well recognized that courts may sua sponte consider legal issues not raised by the parties
concluding that Wis. Stat. § 971.20(5) (1979-80), which provides for the preemptory right of substitution of judges, is constitutional because the statute was enacted in an area of shared power
concluding that Wis. Stat. § 971.20(5) (1979-80), which provides for the preemptory right of substitution of judges, is constitutional because the statute was enacted in an area of shared power
holding that it is well recognized that courts may sua sponte consider legal issues not raised by the parties
relying on statistical evidence to assess the burden on the judicial branch caused by the challenged statute
relying on statistical evidence to assess the burden on the judicial branch caused by the challenged statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shirley S. Abrahamson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.