State v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• When faced with improper remarks to a jury, a trial court must determine whether the remarks have a likelihood of prejudicing the defendant’s right to a fair trial if the trial continues, or if curative instructions may ameliorate whatever prejudice resulted from the improper conduct.
• When faced with improper remarks to a jury, a trial court must determine whether the remarks have a likelihood of prejudicing the defendant’s right to a fair trial if the trial contin- ues, or if curative instructions may ameliorate whatever prejudice resulted from the improper conduct.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pierpoint
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-19· cited 25×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-28· cited 19×
• State v. Madison
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 8×
• State v. Settlemier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-12· cited 5×
• State v. Hassman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-09· cited 3×
• State v. Ray
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-10-02· cited 2×
• State v. Middleton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-05-27· cited 2×
• State v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-12-23· cited 30×
• State v. Seeger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-01-07· cited 28×
• State v. Embry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-12-30· cited 22×
• State v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 10×