Skip to main content

State v. Cook

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 841

Syllabus

Ineffective assistance of counsel guilty plea consecutive sentences mandatory fine. Appellant failed to establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel with regard to a guilty plea where the record does not reflect that counsel gave improper advice and counsel negotiated the dismissal of multiple charges in exchange for the plea. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record accordingly, the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences must stand. Additionally, the trial court appropriately addressed the minimum and maximum sentence. Finally, the trial court properly imposed a mandatory fine. In order to waive the fine, an affidavit averring the appellant is indigent and unable to pay the fine must be filed. As that requirement was not met, the trial court was required to impose the mandatory fine.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.