Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/3/2023

State v. Eldridge

Citations

2023 Ohio 3998

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing statements into evidence under the excited utterance exception to the rule against hearsay or in limiting appellant's cross-examination of a State's witness. Appellant's convictions for failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer were not against the manifest weight of the evidence and were supported by sufficient evidence. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Walker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-22· cited 3×
State v. Fails
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-10· cited 1×
State v. Seibert
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-04

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
Delaware v. Van Arsdall
Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
Ohio v. Hymore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-03-01· cited 556×
State v. Morris
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
State v. Darmond
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
State v. Taylor
Ohio Supreme Court· 1993-05-26· cited 309×
State v. Duncan
Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-03-15· cited 165×
State v. McLoughlin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-22· cited 13×
State v. Hopkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11· cited 12×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.