City of Everett v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• city ordinance criminalizing harassment overbroad and vague in large part due to its prohibition of speech which “alarms or seriously annoys”
• In holding that provisions of an harassment statute are invalid under Coates v. Cincinnati and similar cases, the court stated that the statute “does not draw a reasonably clear line between the kind of annoying conduct which is criminal and that which is not”
• In holding that provisions of an harassment statute are invalid under Coates v. Cincinnati and similar cases, the court stated that the statute \does not draw a reasonably clear line between the kind of annoying conduct which is criminal and that which is not\
• “alarms or seriously annoys” overbroad
• \alarms or seriously annoys\ overbroad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).