Skip to main content

State v. El-Amin

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2905

Syllabus

Affirming the trial court's denial of motion for new trial on grounds that issues involving the alleged non-prosecution agreement were waived and/or were barred under the doctrine of res judicata. Ineffective assistance claims are found not well-taken, as: (1) appellant failed to establish prejudice in connection with his counsel's failure to timely file the motion for new trial and (2) his claim that the non-prosecution agreement should have been read into the record is barred by res judicata.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.