State v. El-Amin
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2905
Syllabus
Affirming the trial court's denial of motion for new trial on grounds that issues involving the alleged non-prosecution agreement were waived and/or were barred under the doctrine of res judicata. Ineffective assistance claims are found not well-taken, as: (1) appellant failed to establish prejudice in connection with his counsel's failure to timely file the motion for new trial and (2) his claim that the non-prosecution agreement should have been read into the record is barred by res judicata.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court· 1994-05-04· cited 435×
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-25· cited 13×
- State v. BarnhartOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-06· cited 4×
- State v. HattonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.