State v. Edison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “this standard has been applied to decisions regarding the qualifications, admissibility, relevancy, and competency of expert testimony”
• A trial court’s findings on a Sensing admissibility challenge are presumed correct on appeal unless the preponderance of the evidence is to the contrary.
• appellate court could not “say that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s finding that the Sensing prerequisites were met,” when the testing officer’s testimony supported the trial court’s determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).