State v. Edison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to decide a question of reviewability because, “[i]f the decisions are not review- able, the correct result is to affirm[,]” and “[i]f the decisions are reviewable but defendant’s arguments fail on the merits, the correct result is still to affirm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Canales
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-01-02· cited 3×
• State v. Finley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-02