State v. Eberhardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the defendant’s argument that Van Norsdall is no longer good law, but concluding that the case “provides no occasion for us to determine if our conclusion in Van Norsdall remains correct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Poston
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-30· cited 33×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 16×
• State v. Marks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-07-19· cited 10×
• State v. Lockamy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 8×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Rutley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-11-08· cited 34×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 29×
• State v. Rutley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 22×
• State v. Burnett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-26· cited 11×
• State v. McCauley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-03-09· cited 10×
• State v. Van Norsdall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 10×
• State v. Huckins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-29· cited 6×
• State v. Kittel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-18· cited 5×