Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/29/2001
State v. Huckins
Citations
- 31 P.3d 485
- 176 Or. App. 276
- 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the defendant’s challenge to indictment “was the functional equivalent of a demurrer,” although mistakenly characterized as a motion to dismiss, and where record did not indicate that trial court was misled by defendant’s mistake, Court of Appeals construed it as a demurrer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Kistler, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court· 1961-04-12· cited 31×
- State v. CookseyOregon Supreme Court· 1965-12-22· cited 20×
- State v. WilcoxOregon Supreme Court· 1959-04-15· cited 17×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-07-23· cited 12×
- State v. GoesserOregon Supreme Court· 1955-02-16· cited 9×
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-12-06· cited 3×
- State v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.