Skip to main content
· 11/27/1995

State v. Portomene

Citations

  • 905 P.2d 1234
  • 79 Wash. App. 863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • delayed entry of CrR 6.1(d) findings and conclusions does not require reversal unless the delay prejudiced the defendant or prevented effective appellate review
  • involving late entry of findings and conclusions after defendant appealed
  • involving late entry of findings and conclusions after defendant appealed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.