· 11/27/1995
State v. Portomene
Citations
- 905 P.2d 1234
- 79 Wash. App. 863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- delayed entry of CrR 6.1(d) findings and conclusions does not require reversal unless the delay prejudiced the defendant or prevented effective appellate review
- involving late entry of findings and conclusions after defendant appealed
- involving late entry of findings and conclusions after defendant appealed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ellington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.