Skip to main content
· 1/19/1990

Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob Borg

Citations

  • 895 F.2d 520
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 605
  • 1990 WL 2833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts have found implied bias where juror is apprized of prejudicial information about the defendant
  • noting that courts have found implied bias where juror is apprized of prejudicial information about the defendant
  • noting that courts have found implied bias where juror is apprized of prejudicial information about the defendant
  • noting that courts have found implied bias where juror is apprized of prejudicial information about the defendant
  • holding that a presumption of juror bias was unwarranted where the defendant was on trial for rape, and the challenged juror had worked as a psychiatric social worker trained to deal with rape victims and at one point had testified on behalf of a rape victim
  • holding that a presumption of juror bias was unwarranted where the defendant was on trial for rape, and the challenged juror had worked as a psychiatric social worker trained to deal with rape victims and at one point had testified on behalf of a rape victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Poole, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.