State v. Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \`It is a basic principle of due process that an enactment is void for vagueness if its prohibitions are not clearly defined. . . .'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ostdiek
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-30· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Alternate Fuels, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-03-25· cited 4×
• State v. DIENSTBACH
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-06-15· cited 3×
• Opinion No. (2009)
  Missouri Attorney General Reports· 2009-08-21

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Chaney
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 291×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1995-02-21· cited 74×
• Cocktail Fortune, Inc. v. Supervisor of Liquor Control
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-06-29· cited 38×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-08-03· cited 17×
• McTeer v. Clarkson Construction Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-04-11· cited 8×