Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 140 S.W.3d 51
  • 2004 Mo. LEXIS 101
  • 2004 WL 1729445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating a judgment was final for purpose of a criminal appeal when the trial court’s judgment dismissed all counts in the information after finding the statutes controlling the charges to be unconstitutionally vague
  • indicating a judgment was final for purpose of a criminal appeal when the trial court’s judgment dismissed all counts in the information after finding the statutes controlling the charges to be unconstitutionally vague
  • “it is inappropriate to project the challenge to factual situations not presented here in which the language used, as applied, might indeed be vague and confusing”
  • where a nurse was charged for failure to report dime to quarter-sized bruises along the spine and a red bruise under the eye of a child already in the foster care system
  • No. SC85582, decided August 3, 2004

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Limbaugh, Stith, Price, Wolff, White, Teitelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.