Skip to main content

State v. Dunham

Citations

  • 560 P.3d 736
  • 336 Or. App. 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because it was unclear which of three paths the trial court “had in mind,” it “would be improper for us to simply presume the necessary factual findings and go directly to the last step of the analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aoyagi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.