State v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• only post-judgment orders that impose a sentence, suspend imposition or execution of a sentence, or affect probation can be appealed under ORS 138.053(1)
• only post-judgment orders that impose a sentence, suspend imposition or execution of a sentence, or affect probation can be appealed under ORS 138.053(1)
• board lacked authority to “correct” erroneous post-prison supervision term embodied in judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hammond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 29×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-09· cited 8×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-01· cited 6×
• State v. Harding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-01-28· cited 6×
• State v. Romero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-04· cited 6×
• State v. Portis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-07-29· cited 3×
• State v. Dunham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-06· cited 3×
• State v. Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-19· cited 2×
• State v. Sager
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-04· cited 2×
• State v. Portis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-20· cited 2×
• State v. Wilkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-07-16· cited 1×
• Dizick v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26· cited 1×
• Guzman v. Board of Parole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-04